<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Twitter, and the Great Unfollowing of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/</link>
	<description>The official webspace of J.C. Hutchins, author and podcaster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent the Closet Geek</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent the Closet Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>Looks like I&#039;m one of the Unfollowed but it&#039;s all good with me. I know the problems that come with the noise of too many people in your stream.

I&#039;ve found the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tweetdeck.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TweetDeck&lt;/a&gt; Twitter client to be really helpful with this b/c it lets me create groups of people i follow so i can watch each group seperately. I have a Podcaster group, a Toronto group and some other ones to cut down the noise when everyone is grouped together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I&#8217;m one of the Unfollowed but it&#8217;s all good with me. I know the problems that come with the noise of too many people in your stream.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found the <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/" rel="nofollow">TweetDeck</a> Twitter client to be really helpful with this b/c it lets me create groups of people i follow so i can watch each group seperately. I have a Podcaster group, a Toronto group and some other ones to cut down the noise when everyone is grouped together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Riekeberg</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Riekeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally with you, J.C. I&#039;ve seen the whole &quot;twitter karma&quot; thing, as you called it, of following people back when they follow you, but I never practiced it myself. If someone followed me, I needed more than that as a reason for me to follow them back, I need to be actually interested in something they do. I don&#039;t have nearly the number of Twitter followers as you do, but if I followed everyone back, the signal to noise ratio becomes so low that Twitter effectively becomes useless for watching what other, interesting people are doing, and only for broadcasting out what you&#039;re doing to your followers. In short, it loses it&#039;s purpose, which is why I do, and have from the beginning, only followed people that I know or somehow find interesting. I&#039;m sorry, this might sound mean, simply having a connection to me by following me doesn&#039;t warrant a follow back. Not everyone I follow I know personally, or even online. For example, some are &quot;Internet famous&quot; public figures, but for everyone I follow, I find them interesting and what they do interesting, which can&#039;t be said for any and every stranger.

This almost kind of seems to have been a taboo subject on Twitter, and I&#039;m glad to see that other people are coming out and saying basically what I&#039;ve felt all along. Even for a relative nobody like me, if I followed everyone back who follows me, Twitter would be a lot more useful. I can&#039;t even imagine how Twitter has any use left when you&#039;ve got followers in the thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally with you, J.C. I&#8217;ve seen the whole &#8220;twitter karma&#8221; thing, as you called it, of following people back when they follow you, but I never practiced it myself. If someone followed me, I needed more than that as a reason for me to follow them back, I need to be actually interested in something they do. I don&#8217;t have nearly the number of Twitter followers as you do, but if I followed everyone back, the signal to noise ratio becomes so low that Twitter effectively becomes useless for watching what other, interesting people are doing, and only for broadcasting out what you&#8217;re doing to your followers. In short, it loses it&#8217;s purpose, which is why I do, and have from the beginning, only followed people that I know or somehow find interesting. I&#8217;m sorry, this might sound mean, simply having a connection to me by following me doesn&#8217;t warrant a follow back. Not everyone I follow I know personally, or even online. For example, some are &#8220;Internet famous&#8221; public figures, but for everyone I follow, I find them interesting and what they do interesting, which can&#8217;t be said for any and every stranger.</p>
<p>This almost kind of seems to have been a taboo subject on Twitter, and I&#8217;m glad to see that other people are coming out and saying basically what I&#8217;ve felt all along. Even for a relative nobody like me, if I followed everyone back who follows me, Twitter would be a lot more useful. I can&#8217;t even imagine how Twitter has any use left when you&#8217;ve got followers in the thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.G. Holyfield</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>P.G. Holyfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>Twitter has needed groups for some time now. Great analysis on the subject, J.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter has needed groups for some time now. Great analysis on the subject, J.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Wellman</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Wellman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>J.C. --
You are right on regarding the difficulty of following too many people on Twitter.  In fact, subsequent to protecting my Twitter ID, I gauge if a new request to follow me is a case of &quot;friend collecting&quot; by the number of people they are following!  It just isn&#039;t possible (or fun) to try to follow more than 100 people in my estimation.

I would be remiss if I didn&#039;t mention that there may also be more people like myself, who follow people with different expectations.  There are friends from home I follow and converse with regularly via Twitter.  Then there are those, such as yourself and some of the other podcast authors, who I am interested in following as a means of accessing early updates on what you are working on or for the banter (between yourself, Sigler, Tee, etc.) and I don&#039;t expect you to follow in return.  Then there are those that I follow because they are just too funny (i.e. @yoda and @darthvader) who I really don&#039;t expect to follow in return.  I think Twitter has evolved from its initial intentions and along with that the expectations of reciprocal follows has evolved as well.
 
All that said, you are made of awesome for even taking the time to explain your intentions with so much detail and care. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.C. &#8211;<br />
You are right on regarding the difficulty of following too many people on Twitter.  In fact, subsequent to protecting my Twitter ID, I gauge if a new request to follow me is a case of &#8220;friend collecting&#8221; by the number of people they are following!  It just isn&#8217;t possible (or fun) to try to follow more than 100 people in my estimation.</p>
<p>I would be remiss if I didn&#8217;t mention that there may also be more people like myself, who follow people with different expectations.  There are friends from home I follow and converse with regularly via Twitter.  Then there are those, such as yourself and some of the other podcast authors, who I am interested in following as a means of accessing early updates on what you are working on or for the banter (between yourself, Sigler, Tee, etc.) and I don&#8217;t expect you to follow in return.  Then there are those that I follow because they are just too funny (i.e. @yoda and @darthvader) who I really don&#8217;t expect to follow in return.  I think Twitter has evolved from its initial intentions and along with that the expectations of reciprocal follows has evolved as well.</p>
<p>All that said, you are made of awesome for even taking the time to explain your intentions with so much detail and care. <img src='http://jchutchins.net/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphael Tehan</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphael Tehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>All these great comments leave me with little to add aside from repeating the germane points, but I&#039;ll comment anyway.

Six months ago I might not have understood the reasoning behind what you had done. Now, I really do. Even at 150 followed, it can be very, very difficult to keep up with conversations at Twitter. At 1,000 or more, I think it becomes an abstraction that could distort the main twitter feed beyond all usefulness. As repeatedly said, at some point conversations become noise, and pretty soon noise becomes intolerable. When that begins to affect the content of your own tweets, limiting them to blog post announcements and little more, something&#039;s got to change.

Six months ago I looked at some of the people I was following -- Wil Wheaton, Xeni Jardin, John Scalzi -- and I had the same feeling as you did: hypocrites. Why should I follow someone who hasn&#039;t the courtesy to follow me back? Now, I have the answer to my own question: noise.

I have a friend who recently found herself trapped and unhappy with her presence on Flickr. It wasn&#039;t an issue of having too few friends or too little attention &#8212; it was that she had far too many. People from all over the world were making her a contact, commenting on each and every photo she posted. She found herself feeling obligated to then comment on each and every photo of each and every contact. It began to consume her days, and the service went from something that enriched her life to something that was a burden. At that point, she felt she had no alternative but to basically shut down her presence on Flickr altogether. It had simply grown out of control. I explained to her that each individual must establish his or her own framework for utilizing social media sites and tools. If the tool has become a burden, it simply is no longer useful.

We&#039;re charting new territory with these social media web tools. As they explode in popularity, the tools will have to adapt to become more versatile &#8212; more critically, though, I believe that we also will have to adapt along with them. Twitter has grown and evolved. To put it simply, you&#039;ve had to readdress your relationship with it.

At the end of the day, if this change in your &quot;policy&quot; has reinvigorated your relationship with Twitter as a tool, that can only result in good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these great comments leave me with little to add aside from repeating the germane points, but I&#8217;ll comment anyway.</p>
<p>Six months ago I might not have understood the reasoning behind what you had done. Now, I really do. Even at 150 followed, it can be very, very difficult to keep up with conversations at Twitter. At 1,000 or more, I think it becomes an abstraction that could distort the main twitter feed beyond all usefulness. As repeatedly said, at some point conversations become noise, and pretty soon noise becomes intolerable. When that begins to affect the content of your own tweets, limiting them to blog post announcements and little more, something&#8217;s got to change.</p>
<p>Six months ago I looked at some of the people I was following &#8212; Wil Wheaton, Xeni Jardin, John Scalzi &#8212; and I had the same feeling as you did: hypocrites. Why should I follow someone who hasn&#8217;t the courtesy to follow me back? Now, I have the answer to my own question: noise.</p>
<p>I have a friend who recently found herself trapped and unhappy with her presence on Flickr. It wasn&#8217;t an issue of having too few friends or too little attention &mdash; it was that she had far too many. People from all over the world were making her a contact, commenting on each and every photo she posted. She found herself feeling obligated to then comment on each and every photo of each and every contact. It began to consume her days, and the service went from something that enriched her life to something that was a burden. At that point, she felt she had no alternative but to basically shut down her presence on Flickr altogether. It had simply grown out of control. I explained to her that each individual must establish his or her own framework for utilizing social media sites and tools. If the tool has become a burden, it simply is no longer useful.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re charting new territory with these social media web tools. As they explode in popularity, the tools will have to adapt to become more versatile &mdash; more critically, though, I believe that we also will have to adapt along with them. Twitter has grown and evolved. To put it simply, you&#8217;ve had to readdress your relationship with it.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, if this change in your &#8220;policy&#8221; has reinvigorated your relationship with Twitter as a tool, that can only result in good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sique Keller</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Sique Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>The Unfollowing is just proof that you know your limits and are willing to make the necessary moves towards self preservation and  away from burnout.

Your craft and your projects require your time and effort and having the wisdom to know when and where to use the effort means that the projects that you spend your time on will  be all the better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Unfollowing is just proof that you know your limits and are willing to make the necessary moves towards self preservation and  away from burnout.</p>
<p>Your craft and your projects require your time and effort and having the wisdom to know when and where to use the effort means that the projects that you spend your time on will  be all the better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Metzger</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Metzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>&lt;1500?? Damn... talk about deafening, I can&#039;t even imagine what that would be like. I say it&#039;s all about getting the best use out of the tool. Truthfully, I only follow those that I have an interest in their updates and connecting with. Likewise, while I am honored when people reciprocate, I don&#039;t expect anyone to follow me back. Trying to swim in the flood of too many tweets just seems counter productive to me. I say, more power to you for seeking out a Hutch friendly Twitter configuration. :) If we (your fans) really need to say something to you there are plenty of other ways we can connect. It&#039;s not like Twitter is the one and only means of connecting with folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;1500?? Damn&#8230; talk about deafening, I can&#8217;t even imagine what that would be like. I say it&#8217;s all about getting the best use out of the tool. Truthfully, I only follow those that I have an interest in their updates and connecting with. Likewise, while I am honored when people reciprocate, I don&#8217;t expect anyone to follow me back. Trying to swim in the flood of too many tweets just seems counter productive to me. I say, more power to you for seeking out a Hutch friendly Twitter configuration. <img src='http://jchutchins.net/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  If we (your fans) really need to say something to you there are plenty of other ways we can connect. It&#8217;s not like Twitter is the one and only means of connecting with folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manata</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Manata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>As one of the un-followed, I can honestly say that I never really expected you to reciprocate my following of you. Your objective view outlined in this post probably should have been the approach from the beginning.

Twitter is not AIM. It is not a chat room. It is not email. It&#039;s not a blog post.  Twitter is a lot of things, but on a fundamental level, it is simply the constant answering of the question &quot;What are you doing?&quot;  Those that care about your answer follow you.

I follow you because I&#039;m interested in your answer.  That alone doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that you are interested in what I&#039;m up to.  I&#039;m not a professional writer.  The day you&#039;re interested in what a twenty-something health care software analyst is doing, that&#039;s when you would follow me.

Besides, it&#039;s not like there aren&#039;t already about 12 different ways to communicate with you if we need or want to.  For that reason alone, I don&#039;t feel that it makes you less accessible.  If anything, it frees you up...removing the time constraints of sifting through clutter, leaving more time for the good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the un-followed, I can honestly say that I never really expected you to reciprocate my following of you. Your objective view outlined in this post probably should have been the approach from the beginning.</p>
<p>Twitter is not AIM. It is not a chat room. It is not email. It&#8217;s not a blog post.  Twitter is a lot of things, but on a fundamental level, it is simply the constant answering of the question &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221;  Those that care about your answer follow you.</p>
<p>I follow you because I&#8217;m interested in your answer.  That alone doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that you are interested in what I&#8217;m up to.  I&#8217;m not a professional writer.  The day you&#8217;re interested in what a twenty-something health care software analyst is doing, that&#8217;s when you would follow me.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s not like there aren&#8217;t already about 12 different ways to communicate with you if we need or want to.  For that reason alone, I don&#8217;t feel that it makes you less accessible.  If anything, it frees you up&#8230;removing the time constraints of sifting through clutter, leaving more time for the good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Mast</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Mast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>I think that it all depends on what you make of Twitter, LiveJournal, Myspace... blah, blah, blah.

All of those social networks seem to start off for us mere mortals as just that, social networks.  I know that the people I started following on Twitter were others I&#039;d met through our common interests.  As I got involved in socializing with those people my network expanded as I dug into finding out about the other people they were communicating with. 

My network grew.

As it stands, the podcast review show we do isn&#039;t pulling down huge numbers, my tweet stream is manageable, and I can pretty much follow everyone who follows me.  I&#039;ve made a few exceptions for people who unintentionally spam the services with &quot;I&#039;m reading this article right now in my google reader&quot; type messages.

I&#039;m using this as a networking tool.  As, I imagine, are a lot of people who are trying to promote a product or service.  

There are those who come at it from a social aspect though.  And in that respect, it might seem a slight if someone doesn&#039;t follow them, or unfollows them.

It&#039;s like the tree on Dagobah.  You get out of it what you bring into it.  If you turn it into a social tool and get your feelings behind it, you have to be prepared for those feelings to be hurt.  If you are using it to network with your fans or those whom you are a fan of, you can&#039;t expect that there is a huge emotional investment on both sides of that &quot;relationship&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it all depends on what you make of Twitter, LiveJournal, Myspace&#8230; blah, blah, blah.</p>
<p>All of those social networks seem to start off for us mere mortals as just that, social networks.  I know that the people I started following on Twitter were others I&#8217;d met through our common interests.  As I got involved in socializing with those people my network expanded as I dug into finding out about the other people they were communicating with. </p>
<p>My network grew.</p>
<p>As it stands, the podcast review show we do isn&#8217;t pulling down huge numbers, my tweet stream is manageable, and I can pretty much follow everyone who follows me.  I&#8217;ve made a few exceptions for people who unintentionally spam the services with &#8220;I&#8217;m reading this article right now in my google reader&#8221; type messages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using this as a networking tool.  As, I imagine, are a lot of people who are trying to promote a product or service.  </p>
<p>There are those who come at it from a social aspect though.  And in that respect, it might seem a slight if someone doesn&#8217;t follow them, or unfollows them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the tree on Dagobah.  You get out of it what you bring into it.  If you turn it into a social tool and get your feelings behind it, you have to be prepared for those feelings to be hurt.  If you are using it to network with your fans or those whom you are a fan of, you can&#8217;t expect that there is a huge emotional investment on both sides of that &#8220;relationship&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not a hypocrite at all JC.  You answer your @&#039;s (mostly) so you&#039;ve got that going on.  You&#039;re still on Twitter.  You make posts like this.  It&#039;s evident you care about your fans.  

Anyone who doesn&#039;t like it, like you said, the whole following thing is voluntary and they can unfollow you if it bothers them that much.  And if it does bother them that much then you&#039;re probably better off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not a hypocrite at all JC.  You answer your @&#8217;s (mostly) so you&#8217;ve got that going on.  You&#8217;re still on Twitter.  You make posts like this.  It&#8217;s evident you care about your fans.  </p>
<p>Anyone who doesn&#8217;t like it, like you said, the whole following thing is voluntary and they can unfollow you if it bothers them that much.  And if it does bother them that much then you&#8217;re probably better off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hunt</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>Its ok Hutch...I still love ya&#039; and the wounds will heal some day   :-)  ...I expected to feel more hurt honestly but it makes great deal of sense and its not like we cant e-mail you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its ok Hutch&#8230;I still love ya&#8217; and the wounds will heal some day   <img src='http://jchutchins.net/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8230;I expected to feel more hurt honestly but it makes great deal of sense and its not like we cant e-mail you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElmoFromOK</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>ElmoFromOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that you are posting this now. I am going through the exact problem you are going through. I realized last week that I was missing a number of tweets of people I really care about, such as my wife! This bothered me muchly and so I am going through and removing followers now , just like you mentioned. 

I do not think this makes you a hypocrite. I think it makes you human. It was fun while it lasted, but it just becomes mostly unusable when you have that many people screaming through your head at any given time. You become like a telepath who has not learned to filter out the periphery. :)

So I do not think you have anything to feel bad about. YOU decide who YOU want to hear.. That&#039;s the main strength of Twitter. Don&#039;t beat yourself up for simply using the service at it&#039;s main strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that you are posting this now. I am going through the exact problem you are going through. I realized last week that I was missing a number of tweets of people I really care about, such as my wife! This bothered me muchly and so I am going through and removing followers now , just like you mentioned. </p>
<p>I do not think this makes you a hypocrite. I think it makes you human. It was fun while it lasted, but it just becomes mostly unusable when you have that many people screaming through your head at any given time. You become like a telepath who has not learned to filter out the periphery. <img src='http://jchutchins.net/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So I do not think you have anything to feel bad about. YOU decide who YOU want to hear.. That&#8217;s the main strength of Twitter. Don&#8217;t beat yourself up for simply using the service at it&#8217;s main strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward G. Talbot</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward G. Talbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>J.C. -

  You know, I&#039;m glad you did this and made this post.  I have not yet gotten to the point where hundreds of people are following me, but I definitely can see it becoming serious noise with 500 or 1000 or more people to follow.  As you say, it&#039;s not that they don&#039;t have anything to offer, it&#039;s that you are only human and you are unable to pay attention to that many tweets.
  Given that people can still @ you, I think it makes a lot of sense.  Give yourself a break.  Only Kilroy 2.0 can be &quot;everywhere&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.C. -</p>
<p>  You know, I&#8217;m glad you did this and made this post.  I have not yet gotten to the point where hundreds of people are following me, but I definitely can see it becoming serious noise with 500 or 1000 or more people to follow.  As you say, it&#8217;s not that they don&#8217;t have anything to offer, it&#8217;s that you are only human and you are unable to pay attention to that many tweets.<br />
  Given that people can still @ you, I think it makes a lot of sense.  Give yourself a break.  Only Kilroy 2.0 can be &#8220;everywhere&#8221; <img src='http://jchutchins.net/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisasterJunkie (Twitter)</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2700</link>
		<dc:creator>DisasterJunkie (Twitter)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2700</guid>
		<description>No worries, JC. I&#039;ve always appreciated the fact that it matters to you to stay close to your following. You&#039;ve immediately responded to the e-mails I&#039;ve sent you over the past two years and that means a lot. It&#039;s a given with your growing popularity (which will, no doubt, become astronomical soon) that you have to lose some of that personal touch. I will continue to follow you and hope if we&#039;re ever in the ballroom at the same time, that I can throw you a bone and you, like the happy puppy that you are, will grace me with a few minutes of conversation.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries, JC. I&#8217;ve always appreciated the fact that it matters to you to stay close to your following. You&#8217;ve immediately responded to the e-mails I&#8217;ve sent you over the past two years and that means a lot. It&#8217;s a given with your growing popularity (which will, no doubt, become astronomical soon) that you have to lose some of that personal touch. I will continue to follow you and hope if we&#8217;re ever in the ballroom at the same time, that I can throw you a bone and you, like the happy puppy that you are, will grace me with a few minutes of conversation.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Wagner</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there should be an &quot;social&quot; obligation on Twitter or any similar process that should require one to add one&#039;s followers.

As you said, doing so can lead to significant &quot;noise&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there should be an &#8220;social&#8221; obligation on Twitter or any similar process that should require one to add one&#8217;s followers.</p>
<p>As you said, doing so can lead to significant &#8220;noise&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainstream Jane</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainstream Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>First let me say, I represent the mainstream. Yes, JC you’ve gone mainstream and I think that bodes well for your upcoming publication. I am that soccer mom sweet spot that every marketer and politician loves to woo. I don’t know Klingon or Lynx (please insert pure envy for those who do). In fact, this is the first time I’ve responded to a blog post. I am as average Jane as you can get with the 2.5 kids and a house in the burbs. I found 7th Son by complete accident and had to read “Apple Help i-tunes” before downloading. Because of you and your wonderful 7th Son trilogy and your fantastic Ultra Creative interviews (please don’t stop doing them) I have found a whole new world. I subscribe to several podcasts and podiobooks. I’ve taken to saying “bad ass” a lot, with many giggles from earlier noted children (I am really worried what new vocabulary I am going to pick up from the Siegler book that I just downloaded).

I joined twitter because of all the talk on your podcasts. I am feeling my way around this new media and teaching my girlfriends all about it. I never expected to be followed back as I reached in and felt my way around the room. I mean what would you really get from an exchange about the new “Skinny Bitch” book? In fact, I am not sure what I get from that exchange. I have to assume I am not the only mainstream convert out there. I can imagine many, like myself, are just thrilled to follow you. Give yourself a guilt break and write, we’ll be just fine. Thank again for introducing me to new universes (fiction and otherwise).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First let me say, I represent the mainstream. Yes, JC you’ve gone mainstream and I think that bodes well for your upcoming publication. I am that soccer mom sweet spot that every marketer and politician loves to woo. I don’t know Klingon or Lynx (please insert pure envy for those who do). In fact, this is the first time I’ve responded to a blog post. I am as average Jane as you can get with the 2.5 kids and a house in the burbs. I found 7th Son by complete accident and had to read “Apple Help i-tunes” before downloading. Because of you and your wonderful 7th Son trilogy and your fantastic Ultra Creative interviews (please don’t stop doing them) I have found a whole new world. I subscribe to several podcasts and podiobooks. I’ve taken to saying “bad ass” a lot, with many giggles from earlier noted children (I am really worried what new vocabulary I am going to pick up from the Siegler book that I just downloaded).</p>
<p>I joined twitter because of all the talk on your podcasts. I am feeling my way around this new media and teaching my girlfriends all about it. I never expected to be followed back as I reached in and felt my way around the room. I mean what would you really get from an exchange about the new “Skinny Bitch” book? In fact, I am not sure what I get from that exchange. I have to assume I am not the only mainstream convert out there. I can imagine many, like myself, are just thrilled to follow you. Give yourself a guilt break and write, we’ll be just fine. Thank again for introducing me to new universes (fiction and otherwise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobinInSeoul</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>RobinInSeoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this, Hutch. I follow only those who&#039;s recent tweets interest me, who know many of the same people I know, who are from the same area as me, or are in the same field. When the noise outweighs the signal, I pare back my follow list. My updates are protected and I do not automatically follow back people I allow to follow me. Some may say it&#039;s rude, but that&#039;s life in the big city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this, Hutch. I follow only those who&#8217;s recent tweets interest me, who know many of the same people I know, who are from the same area as me, or are in the same field. When the noise outweighs the signal, I pare back my follow list. My updates are protected and I do not automatically follow back people I allow to follow me. Some may say it&#8217;s rude, but that&#8217;s life in the big city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Newquist</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Newquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>I think everyone on twitter reaches this point eventually (or hobbles together a semi-sentient system of scripts to parse the cacophony. I&#039;ve been growing increasingly cautious following new people over the last few months because I&#039;ve been sensing the nature of the conversation in my tweetstream changing, and I&#039;m beginning to think that following 150-200 people is probably the best we mere humans can do and still be able to keep up with the people and conversations we want to track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone on twitter reaches this point eventually (or hobbles together a semi-sentient system of scripts to parse the cacophony. I&#8217;ve been growing increasingly cautious following new people over the last few months because I&#8217;ve been sensing the nature of the conversation in my tweetstream changing, and I&#8217;m beginning to think that following 150-200 people is probably the best we mere humans can do and still be able to keep up with the people and conversations we want to track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.C. Chapman</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>C.C. Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>I think your making more out of this then you need to Hutch. I&#039;ve always believed that people should use any and all social media tools in the way that works best for them.

I&#039;ve never been able to follow everyone who follows me. I once had someone call me out at a conference about this and I explained that I follow people who I either know or that I really want to hear what they have to say. I constantly am adding and deleting people to try and keep some sort of balance between &quot;the noise&quot; and being a useful part of my life.

Do what works for you. Figure out which tools are best and use them. Want to change? Go for it.

Everyone needs to chill, enjoy and stop worrying about how everyone else is using things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your making more out of this then you need to Hutch. I&#8217;ve always believed that people should use any and all social media tools in the way that works best for them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been able to follow everyone who follows me. I once had someone call me out at a conference about this and I explained that I follow people who I either know or that I really want to hear what they have to say. I constantly am adding and deleting people to try and keep some sort of balance between &#8220;the noise&#8221; and being a useful part of my life.</p>
<p>Do what works for you. Figure out which tools are best and use them. Want to change? Go for it.</p>
<p>Everyone needs to chill, enjoy and stop worrying about how everyone else is using things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>As one of the Great Unfollowed of 2008 I have to say it&#039;s all good, man.  I&#039;m following you because I enjoy your work and you post some stuff that entertains me.  Your logic is sound.  Sometimes with the mere dozen or so people I&#039;m following, there&#039;s more than I&#039;ve got time to keep up with.  I can&#039;t imagine with hundreds or thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the Great Unfollowed of 2008 I have to say it&#8217;s all good, man.  I&#8217;m following you because I enjoy your work and you post some stuff that entertains me.  Your logic is sound.  Sometimes with the mere dozen or so people I&#8217;m following, there&#8217;s more than I&#8217;ve got time to keep up with.  I can&#8217;t imagine with hundreds or thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne the Man</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne the Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>I can fully relate to what you write. It caused me to unfollow in a very early stage and always keep the numbers under 100.
The best days were when the IM service still worked. With the few people I follow, I was happy to get these signs of life. With more or with people who sent tweets every other second, it became noise. Just as you say. Sorry to repeat you, but I feel exactly the same</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can fully relate to what you write. It caused me to unfollow in a very early stage and always keep the numbers under 100.<br />
The best days were when the IM service still worked. With the few people I follow, I was happy to get these signs of life. With more or with people who sent tweets every other second, it became noise. Just as you say. Sorry to repeat you, but I feel exactly the same</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Diehl</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Diehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t see an issue with this. From the start I&#039;ve never auto followed folks who followed me. I&#039;d look at their post list and if in the first page or two they had something that perked my interest, I followed them. Or if their listed website was interesting, etc.

I only casually use twitter myself, and while I like it, it is an issue keeping up with the less than 50 folks I have on my list.

Folks have a right to change their mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t see an issue with this. From the start I&#8217;ve never auto followed folks who followed me. I&#8217;d look at their post list and if in the first page or two they had something that perked my interest, I followed them. Or if their listed website was interesting, etc.</p>
<p>I only casually use twitter myself, and while I like it, it is an issue keeping up with the less than 50 folks I have on my list.</p>
<p>Folks have a right to change their mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stanger</title>
		<link>http://jchutchins.net/site/2008/08/03/on-twitter-and-the-great-unfollowing-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 06:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jchutchins.net/site/?p=352#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not a hypocrite, Hutch. Reads like you&#039;re just tuning your experience. And it is YOUR experience that matters when it&#039;s you that has to deal with the stream. I&#039;ve never understood how people can find a stream with thousands of people posting to it at one time useful, anyway. With hundreds and hundreds of posts per day unless you&#039;re just sitting there reading your friend stream all day you probably only end up catching a small handful, and at those odds you&#039;d be just as well off perusing the public timeline a few times a day.

So agonize no longer, warrior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not a hypocrite, Hutch. Reads like you&#8217;re just tuning your experience. And it is YOUR experience that matters when it&#8217;s you that has to deal with the stream. I&#8217;ve never understood how people can find a stream with thousands of people posting to it at one time useful, anyway. With hundreds and hundreds of posts per day unless you&#8217;re just sitting there reading your friend stream all day you probably only end up catching a small handful, and at those odds you&#8217;d be just as well off perusing the public timeline a few times a day.</p>
<p>So agonize no longer, warrior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
